Legal Opinion

Skaggs v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 1, 1984No. 82-437; 82-438; CA A28724PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a post-conviction relief case. Appellant seeks reversal of a trial court judgment denying him relief on the ground of lack of jurisdiction from municipal court convi'ctions for a municipal “bad check” charge (trial court case number 82-437) and for a state driving while suspended charge (trial court case number 82-438). The ruling as to the municipal charge was correct. Rutherford v. City of Klamath Falls, 19 Or App 103, 526 P2d 645 (1974). The ruling as to the state charge was not.

There are remaining factual issues concerning the state charge. Affirmed as to trial court case number…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rutherford v. City of Klamath FallsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hunter v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hunter v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Skaggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Koellermeier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API