Legal Opinion
Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 4, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
82 N.J. Super. 222 (1964)
197 A.2d 390
JOSEPH RICCIARDI, PETITIONER-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
DAMAR PRODUCTS COMPANY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 30, 1963.
Decided February 4, 1964.
Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Norman Peterkin argued the cause for petitioner-appellant and cross-respondent (Messrs. Friedman & D'Alessandro, attorneys).
Mr. Herman D. Michels argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Messrs. Toner, Crowley, Woelper & Vanderbilt, attorneys; Mr. Marshall Crowley and Mr.…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Matter of Wilson v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sica v. Retail Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Oliver Vélez v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969
- Stellmah v. HUNTERDON COOP. GLF SERV., INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Vélez v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969