Legal Opinion

Mitsui & Co. v. El Dorado Oil Works

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 24, 1941No. 21230-SPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ST. SURE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, having in its possession the sum of $2,860 under an arbitration award, to which there are adverse claimants, filed a bill of interpleader under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 41, subd. 26, and deposited the money here to abide the judgment of the Court.

Claimants to the fund, defendants Alexander D. Diamond, El Dorado Oil Works, and President and Directors of the Manhattan Company, each claiming a lien, submitted the case upon an agreed statement of facts. Since submission, through further agreement, the controversy is now between defendants Diamond and El…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Larkin v. RobbinsNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. In re AlbrechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. In re the Estate of LevineNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  4. McNulty v. . SolleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Chorosh v. WoodburyNew York Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gelfand, Greer, Popko & Miller v. ShivenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API