Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 21, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-1650PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 689, AFL-CIO (“Local 689”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff Charles Rogers’ Complaint for a second time. The court denied Local 689’s first motion to dismiss, when it extended the time for service and relieved Rogers of his failure to properly serve the union within 120 days, as required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. With Rogers now having perfected service, Local 689 tries a different tact, arguing that Plaintiff's sole claim against it for breach of duty of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roderick Courtney Mann v. American AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Rudder v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Battle v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Rogers v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689District Court, District of Columbia · 2015

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. McLeanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API