Legal Opinion

Wattenbarger v. Tullock

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1954PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice SwepstoN

This is a petition for certiorari and supersedeas issued on the fiat of Justice Burnett and a supersedeas bond in the amount of $500 was given.

By reason whereof a sale of land which had been ordered by the Chancellor was stayed. A brief recital of the essential facts is all that is necessary to dispose of the case. On the 22nd day of September 1951, Glenn Wattenbarger and wife, Myrtle Wattenbarger, sold and conveyed by deed to J. B. Tullock and wife, Eunice Tullock, their farm in McMinn County, consisting* of about 140 *282acres. They did not retain. ,an express vendor’s lien, nor did they take…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Conners v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State ex rel. McMorrow v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Isreal v. GuyTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Wood v. CooperTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Vineyard v. VineyardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Saunders v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Medic Ambulance Service, Inc. v. McAdamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Harrison v. Greeneville Ready-Mix, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Puckett v. BroomeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  5. Taylor v. Continental Tennessee Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API