Legal Opinion · Dissent

Norton v. Hall

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 30, 2003Published

1Dissent

ALEXANDER, J.,

with whom DANA, J. and CALKINS, J., join dissenting.

[¶ 25] I respectfully dissent. Prior to enactment of the Maine Tort Claims Act, governmental entities, though protected by sovereign immunity,5 accepted responsibility for injuries to others caused by negligent operation of their motor vehicles. See Russell v. Nadeau, 139 Me. 286, 29 A.2d 916 (1943) (affirming a finding of liability in a case where a plaintiffs injuries were caused by a fire truck, responding to an emergency call, which entered an intersection against a red light); Parker v. Knox, 147 Me. 396, 87 A.2d 663…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Davies v. City of BathSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Ames v. Dipietro-Kay Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. Blier v. Inhabitants of Town of Fort KentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  5. Russell v. NadeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API