Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Mayer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1976No. 40509PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This is an action by Norval Brandt, a contractor, to recover a balance due on an oral contract to construct a residence for defendants, Lyle and Manette Mayer. The issue tried was whether the oral agreement was made on a cost-plus basis. The trial court determined plaintiff failed to prove a cost-plus agreement. The trial court further found plaintiff also failed to prove the reasonable value of overhead and profit. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff in the amount of $4,432.92. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

After trial, the court determined plaintiff and defendants entered into an agreement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Siefford v. Housing Auth. of City of HumboldtNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. S. A. Sorensen Construction Co. v. BroyhillNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Jensen v. MantheNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Timmons v. NelsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Engel v. MeadNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Koperski v. Husker Dodge, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Rieschick Drilling Co. v. American Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Gernstein v. AllenNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Mid City Bank, Inc. v. Omaha Butcher Supply, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Bruno ex rel. Bruno v. KellyNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API