Legal Opinion

Hubb Diggs Co. v. Fort Worth State Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1927No. 4772PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge NICKELS

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

Knapp bought of Hubb Diggs Company a Ford coupe, largely on credit. He executed and delivered to the company twelve notes, of a series, each for the principal sum of $44.14, except the last of the series, and it was for the principal sum of $44.15. The notes, however, were not in form made payable to Hubb Diggs Company; the named payee was Guaranty State Bank. At the same time Knapp executed and delivered to the company a chattel mortgage, naming Guaranty State Bank as mortgagee. The bank, however, had no interest…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Emerson v. SlaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. LevyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Pope v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Muller v. RiviereTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Lemmon v. BoxTexas Supreme Court · 1857

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wood v. Canfield Paper Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Kelly v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. First Nat. Bank of O'Donnell v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Guardian Trust Co. v. BauereisenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Spokane Security Finance Co. v. J. A. Anderson Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API