Furniss v. Rennick
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin
The question presented by this appeal is whether a deponent’s estate may rely on Supreme Court Rule 212 (134 Ill. 2d R. 212) to bar the use of admissions made by the deponent in a discovery deposition taken before his death. For the reasons that follow, we hold that it cannot.
Judy Furniss filed a legal malpractice action against attorney John Rennick alleging that he breached a duty of professional care when drafting the wills of her father and stepmother, Paul and Edna Carroll. The action arose following Paul’s death when Edna revoked her will that directed that the family residence and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bonaguro v. the County Officers Electoral BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Fearon v. Mobil Joliet Refining Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Abel v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Arnett v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Patten v. KnoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Estate of RennickIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- West Bend Mutual Insurance v. HerreraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Nix v. WhiteheadAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- In re Estate of RennickIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Camco v. LoweryAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.