Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Rennick

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1998No. 82872PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nickels

In this appeal, we decide whether admissions contained in a discovery deposition are admissible against a deceased party’s estate. Plaintiff, Judy Furniss, brought a professional negligence action against attorney John D. Rennick, alleging malpractice in the preparation of an estate plan. Following attorney Rennick’s death, his estate was substituted as a party. Prior to trial, plaintiff sought a ruling on the admissibility against Rennick’s estate of admissions Rennick made in a discovery deposition. The Peoria County circuit court ruled that under Supreme Court Rule 212 (134 Ill. 2d R.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Busch v. Graphic Color Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. People v. BoleIllinois Supreme Court · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of RennickIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API