Legal Opinion
Serota v. Serota
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.
The plaintiff wife demands judgment against her husband declaring him holder of title to certain property in trust for the benefit of herself and her husband “ as tenants in the entirety” and that the husband be directed to convey the property to them as husband and wife.
The evidence adduced at the trial has established the following facts: Prior to and after their marriage in June, 1947 husband and wife discussed where they intended to live. After *456a search in the Summer and Fall of 1951 they decided on the subject property as “ our house On September 23, 1951 the husband made a $100 down…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Sinclair v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Foreman v. ForemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Latham v. Father DivineNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Wheeler v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Catron v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Catron v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967