Legal Opinion

People v. Lane

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1996No. 99664, Calendar No. 5PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*134Weaver, J.

We have before us a narrow issue, whether the trial court committed error requiring reversal in failing to advise defendant of his right to counsel, pursuant to MCR 6.005(E),1 before the habitual offender trial and the sentencing hearing.2 We do not review the error committed at the habitual offender trial, because it was not properly preserved. In reviewing the court’s failure to comply with the court rule before the sentencing hearing, we find the error harmless because defendant does not allege that he was prejudiced by it. We affirm defendant’s convictions and sentence.

*135I

While an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. In Re Guilty Plea CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. CampbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Pouncy v. PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  3. People v. BelangerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People of Michigan v. Elliot RiversMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. People of Michigan v. Frank KingMichigan Supreme Court · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API