Legal Opinion

Pouncy v. Palmer

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 11, 2016No. Case No. 13-cv-14695PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS *

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), the United States Supreme Court held that a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to represent himself at trial. But the Supreme Court stressed that a defendant’s waiver of his right to counsel (and decision to defend himself) is valid only if it is truly voluntary — a free “choice” made with “eyes wide open.” Id. at 835, 95 S.Ct. 2525.

In this case, Petitioner Omar Rashad Pouncy (“Pouncy”)…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Omar Pouncy v. Carmen PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. Omar Pouncy v. Carmen PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. Pouncy v. PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API