Pouncy v. Palmer
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS *
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
In Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), the United States Supreme Court held that a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to represent himself at trial. But the Supreme Court stressed that a defendant’s waiver of his right to counsel (and decision to defend himself) is valid only if it is truly voluntary — a free “choice” made with “eyes wide open.” Id. at 835, 95 S.Ct. 2525.
In this case, Petitioner Omar Rashad Pouncy (“Pouncy”)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Omar Pouncy v. Carmen PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Omar Pouncy v. Carmen PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Pouncy v. PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025