Legal Opinion

Fusco v. Dauphin

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 2, 1952No. 571 Civil Action, 1950PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, J.:

This was an accident case. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, I directed a nonsuit. A motion for new trial was filed and argued.

Because the defendant was not obliged to put in his defense, we are limited to the following meager facts established by plaintiff.

Plaintiff was riding as a passenger on a motorcycle driven by one Farone. Both Farone and plaintiff were minors, the former having no driver’s license. Farone was operating his machine south on Union Street in the City of Wilmington. The only evidence of his speed is that it was from fifteen to twenty miles per hour. At…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burris v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1904
  2. Szymanski v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Delaware · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott v. GraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. Richards v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Kerr ex rel. Kerr v. MillsNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hermann v. WohlersOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Wise v. George C. Rothwell, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API