Legal Opinion

Richards v. Anderson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1959No. 8970PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff sued and defendant counterclaimed for damages to their cars resulting from an intersection collision between the two. After pretrial conference, upon the basis of counsel’s statement as to what the proof would show, plaintiff’s affidavit and a written report of claim presented as evidence, the court ruled both parties negligent and dismissed the action.

Plaintiff appeals, attacking the summary judgment as arbitrarily depriving him of the right to a trial and to fully present his evidence and contentions. It is true that summary judgment is a severe measure…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Morris v. Farnsworth MotelUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Coombs v. PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Compton v. Ogden Union Ry. & Depot Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Fusco v. DauphinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rees v. Albertson's, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Lafferty v. WattleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Whitman v. WT Grant CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Gammon v. Federated Milk Producers Ass'n, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Larson v. Wycoff Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API