Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Succession of Albert E. Pittman .

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 2020No. 2019-CA-0683Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

SUCCESSION OF ALBERT E. * NO. 2019-CA-0683 PITTMAN * COURT OF APPEAL * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* RML LEDET, J., DISSENTS WITH REASONS The majority concludes that summary judgment in the Trustee’s favor was appropriate for the following two reasons:  The Trustee “put forth undisputed [documentary] evidence that [Ms.] Montgomery previously, until the filing of the Rule to Remove, knew and approved of the position—held by Gloria as Trustee and representative of the estate—that Gloria had the right to expend the Trust funds as she saw fit and the right to invade the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hines v. GarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. Jones v. Estate of SantiagoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  3. Willis v. MeddersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  4. Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Com'n of Calcasieu ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  5. Roadrunner Transportation Systems v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API