Pearce v. Commissioner
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Feankfcjbteb
The social fact that a husband is normally under a responsibility to provide for his wife even after they are divorced, is the basis for the rule that monies received by a wife under a divorce settlement are presumed to be in discharge of a continuing obligation of the husband. I therefore agree with the decision of the Court to the extent that it reinforces this rule as a rule of policy, and not one of caprice varying with the sex of the taxpayer against whom the Commissioner chooses to proceed. I agree that if the Commissioner proceeds against the wife, “she sustains her burden of rebutting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Harrison v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Helvering v. FitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Helvering v. LeonardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.