Legal Opinion

Wakefield v. Hills

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1988No. Docket 98863, 98864, 104284PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from Berrien Circuit Court orders granting summary disposition in favor of defendants based on the statute of limitations. MCR 2.116(C)(7). We reverse.

Plaintiff Peggy Wakefield had appendicitis in November, 1973, when she was about fourteen years old. She underwent surgery including an appendectomy. In 1974 and 1975, she underwent additional surgery to drain abscesses secondary to her ruptured appendix. Peggy Wakefield claims that on or about February 21, 1984, she was informed for the first time that her right ovary and both Fallopian tubes were destroyed by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dyke v. RichardMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Adkins v. Annapolis HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Adkins v. Annapolis HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Kelleher v. MillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Leary v. RuppMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moss v. PacquingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Levinson v. SklarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Kermizian v. SumcadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Eberhard v. Harper-Grace HospitalsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Moss v. PacquingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API