Young v. City of Lexington
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Dietzman
Affirming.
The sole question presented on this appeal is the validity of the license ordinance of the city of Lexington, which imposes an annual license tax of $75 upon the business of a “painting contractor.” The lower court held it valid, and, from its judgment so adjudging, this appeal is prosecuted.
Section 1 of the ordinance imposes the tax upon “each person, firm or corporation doing business in the City of Lexington as a painting contractor.”
Section 2 defines a “painting contractor” as: “Every firm consisting of two or more members, and every person…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hager v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Brown-Foreman Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- City of Louisville v. Sagalowski & SonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Commonwealth v. Payne Medicine Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- City of Danville v. Quaker Maid, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Conard v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1940
- Moore v. State Bd. of Charities and CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Karnes v. City of BentonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Paducah Automotive Trades Ass'n v. City of PaducahCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- White v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943