Legal Opinion

Conard v. State

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 28, 1940PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

Some preliminary and passing attention should be ac*113corded the question as to whether the pertinent statute is an exercise of the police power of the State, or whether its main purpose is the raising of revenue. While not of primary importance, the question has materiality as touching the question of classification of the subjects of the license and of discrimination, for under the police power, the legislative control is not concerned with the identical rules as in the imposition of taxes. In Yourison v. State, 3 W. W. Harr. (33 Del.) 577, 140 A.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Quong Wing v. KirkendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bellington v. Township of East WindsorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  3. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Publicker Commercial Alcohol Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Pa. Liq. Con. Bd. v. PublickerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API