Legal Opinion
APONTE v. POTTSTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 27, 2020No. 2:18-cv-03199Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHANICQUA APONTE, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. POTTSTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT, NO. 18-3199 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case concerns a years-long dispute between pro se Plaintiff Shanicqua Aponte and the Pottstown School District (“Defendant” or “the District”) regarding the education of her minor, special-needs child, D.H. In early 2018, Plaintiff initiated a due process hearing with Pennsylvania’s Office for Dispute Resolution (“ODR”), alleging that the District had failed to meet its obligations under the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Winkelman Ex Rel. Winkelman v. Parma City School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- S.H., Individually and on Behalf of I.H. v. State-Operated School District of the City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Carlisle Area School v. Scott P., by and Through His Guardians, Bess P. And Richard E. P., in No. 94-7520. Carlisle Area School District, in No. 94-7539 v. Scott P., by and Through His Guardians, Bess P. And Richard E. PCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.