Fonseca v. Judges of the Family Court
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarmine A. Ventiera, J.
In this article 78 proceeding the petitioner, a boy 15 years of age, seeks an order prohibiting the respondents, Judges of the Family Court of the County of Kings, from reconducting a fact-finding hearing, upon the ground that to do so would place him in double jeopardy. A statement of the facts will project into focus the questions involved which are: first, whether the record presents a case of double jeopardy; second, whether the exception of “ manifest ” or ‘ ‘ imperious necessity ’ ’ is applicable; and third, whether the constitutional safeguard against double jeopardy applies to a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cornero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- United States ex rel. Hetenyi v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Mark R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- State v. BrunsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Burton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- McCorkle v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- In re Barry M.New York City Family Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.