Legal Opinion

Fonseca v. Judges of the Family Court

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1969PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarmine A. Ventiera, J.

In this article 78 proceeding the petitioner, a boy 15 years of age, seeks an order prohibiting the respondents, Judges of the Family Court of the County of Kings, from reconducting a fact-finding hearing, upon the ground that to do so would place him in double jeopardy. A statement of the facts will project into focus the questions involved which are: first, whether the record presents a case of double jeopardy; second, whether the exception of “ manifest ” or ‘ ‘ imperious necessity ’ ’ is applicable; and third, whether the constitutional safeguard against double jeopardy applies to a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Cornero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  5. United States ex rel. Hetenyi v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Mark R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. State v. BrunsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Burton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. McCorkle v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. In re Barry M.New York City Family Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API