McCorkle v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ALPERT, Judge.
In the fourth year of President James Monroe’s second term (1824), Supreme Court Justice Story declared the polestar of mistrial/double jeopardy cases: the “manifest necessity” rule.
The issue in this case is whether the trial court correctly declared a mistrial based on the unexpected absence of the key prosecution witness. In contending that the mistrial was declared improperly, appellant Gregory Allen McCorkle has asked us to address the following six questions:
1. Did the trial judge fail to exercise sound discretion in declaring the existence of manifest necessity for a…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Adrian Montgomery v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
- Hubbard v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- In re Petition for Habeas Corpus by BowmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- In re Petition for Habeas Corpus by BowmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.