Legal Opinion

Thomason v. Willingham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 19, 1968No. 43764PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

Enumerations of error which are not argued in appellant’s brief are deemed to have been abandoned.

A charge excepted to and enumerated as error was: “I charge you that a motorist has a right to follow another motorist at a reasonable and safe distance. However, he must govern his speed or keep back a reasonably safe distance so as to provide for the contingency of a car in front suddenly stopping, and he must keep a proper lookout for the car immediately preceding him so that he can avoid a collision, or can turn out sufficiently to pass without going across the street in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cone v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. SkipperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Atlanta Street Railroad v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Flanigan v. RevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Hay v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Eberhart v. Morris Brown CollegeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Cagle v. AtchleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Magnan v. Miami Aircraft Support, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Conner v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API