Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Roberson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 17, 1935No. 8 Div. 615PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Accord and satisfaction of a claim for damages under the homicide act, Code, § 5696, upon compromise settlement between the sole beneficiary and the party charged is binding as against an administrator thereafter appointed. Kennedy v. Davis, 171 Ala. 609, 55 So. 104, Ann. Cas. 1913B, 225; Fischer v. Pope et al., 229 Ala. 170, 155 So. 579.

After appointment of an administrator, the chose in action is vested in him'for the purposes of bringing suit, prosecuting to judgment, or entering into any compromise, accord, and satisfaction, and making distribution to those entitled under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Sheffield Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Fischer v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Farmers' Union Warehouse Co. v. Barnett Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Newell v. BushardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Williams v. WickerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Carter v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Claude Jones & Son v. LairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. McGough Bakeries Corporation v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. SwainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API