Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Pope

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 10, 1934No. 6 Div. 404PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The appeal is from a final decree in equity on settlement of the administration of an estate.

Both parties here suggest there was no note of testimony on submission pursuant to Chancery Rule 75. They differ as to whether, in the circumstances of this case, such omission should work a reversal or an affirmance of the decree.

The decree recites: “This cause coming on to be heard is submitted to the court for final decree by the consent of the parties in open court upon pleadings and proof heretofore noted by the Register.”

The record discloses a note of testimony made on a former…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kennedy v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees of University of Ala. v. HarrellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Price v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Petersen v. KemperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Hampton v. RobersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Heath v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API