Pryor v. Pryor
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
1. “The brief of evidence can not be considered by this court. The trial judge was without authority to approve the brief of evidence after the bill of exceptions had been certified.” Therefore the judgment of the court awarding the child to the mother must be affirmed. Simpson v. Simpson, 138 Ga. 204 (75 S. E. 98) ; Boatright v. Boatright, 150 Ga. 68 (102 S. E. 424). But the bill of exceptions will not be dismissed.
2. Aside from the contention that the evidence does not authorize the judgment, the bill of exceptions contains only one additional assignment of error, i. e., that the court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lamar v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Landrum v. LandrumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Woodland v. WoodlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Hammond v. MurraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Simpson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Cutis v. GeigerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Cobb v. DeLongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Hall v. MacOn, Dublin Savannah Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Fernandez v. SamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964