Legal Opinion
Michael v. Ghee
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 12, 2004No. 3:01 CV 7436PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This is a class action by Ohio prisoners against the Ohio Parole Board claiming, inter alia, reverse discrimination on the basis of race in the granting of parole. Pending is a motion by the state to stay proceedings. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted.
Plaintiffs brought this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging various aspects of the “new” parole system in Ohio. Plaintiffs’ claims are premised on § 1983. (Pl.’s Opp. to Motion to Stay, at 4.) Defendants request a stay (i.e., postponement of the filing of the state’s reply brief…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- William Dwight Dotson v. Reginald A. Wilkinson, Rogerico Johnson v. Margarette GheeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Aerpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. QuagginDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Boone v. StieveDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Cassaday v. Dow Chemical CoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Glardon v. Speedway, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.