Caveny v. Healey
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the First District Court of Jersey City.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
The Prudential Insurance Company issued two policies of life insurance on the life of Michael Caveny. By one they insured his life and agreed to pay the stipulated benefit subject to certain conditions; one of which was that the amount should be paid to his executors, administrators or assigns unless settlement were made under what is called the facility of payment clause. That clause permitted the *29company to make payment to any one of certain classes of persons or to any other person appearing to the company to he equitably entitled by…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Uptegrove v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Fulcher v. ParkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
- French v. LanhamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
- Lutostanski v. LutostanskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Prudential Insurance Co. v. GleimNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.