Legal Opinion

State v. Daino

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 13, 2020No. 120824PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 120,824 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. GIANNI MASSIMO DAINO, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and section 15 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures. 2. A warrantless search is presumptively unreasonable unless it falls within a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. Consent to search is one such exception. 3. The existence and voluntariness of a consent to search is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nancy May Hawken v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  3. State v. ArredondoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  4. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
  5. State v. GoodroCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API