Los Angeles County Transportation Commission v. Richmond
California Supreme Court
1DissentRichardson, J.
I respectfully dissent.
Article XIII A, section 4 of the California Constitution provides: “Cities, Counties and special districts, by a two-thirds vote of the qualified electors of such district, may impose special taxes on such district, except ad valorem taxes on real property or a transaction tax or sales tax on the sale of real property within such City, County or special district.”
The majority concludes that this constitutional limitation does not bar a retail transaction and use tax (sales tax) which is to be operative throughout Los Angeles County and which was approved by only 54…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Gordon v. LanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Carter v. Commission on Qualifications of Judicial AppointmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- San Diego Building Contractors Ass'n v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.