Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 23, 1849PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the Boyle Circuit. Registry vf mortgages. Detinue, Case 101.

1Opinion of the Court

Jbdge;'Sihpson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Vaughn sold a horse to Totten, and took from him & mortgage on the horse’to secure the payment of the purchase money. The sale was made in the county of •Garrard, and the mortgage acknowledged and recorded in that county. Totten resided in the’ county of Lincoln, and immediately after his purchase, returned home, and took the horse along with him. He after-wards sold or made some disposition of the horse, and he came into the possession of Bell.

Vaughn then brought this suit against Bell for the horse, claiming title -to him under the aforesaid…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Singleton v. Young's ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Day & Congleton Lumber Co. v. Stadler & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  2. Coppage v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  3. Beaver Creek Consol. Coal Co. v. Porter Min. Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1929
  4. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. CollinsworthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API