Legal Opinion

Singleton v. Young's Executors

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 4, 1835PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Chancery. From the Circuit Court for Breckinridge County.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

'This case depends upon the question whether a mortgage of slaves and personalty, made in 1819, and recorded within eight months,, in the county in which the mortgagor resided, and in which a part of the slaves and personalty was also situated, at the time, is valid against a a subsequent purchaser of one of the slaves conveyed by the mortgage, but which was not, at its date, nor at any time afterwards, in the county in which the mortgage deed is recorded.

Until the passage of the act of 1820 (1 Stat. Law, 448,) no act has, in direct terms,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Bank v. HuthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1844
  2. Day & Congleton Lumber Co. v. Stadler & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  3. Coppage v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  4. Beaver Creek Consol. Coal Co. v. Porter Min. Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1929
  5. Vaughn v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1849

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API