Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Fisher

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1918No. Civ. No. 1698PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The action involved the validity of a sale of certain horses and mules under chattel mortgage of the same given in connection with a real estate mortgage to secure the payment of a promissory note of four thousand dollars and interest. The sale of said personal property was set aside by the court by reason of irregularity in the proceedings connected with said sale and, also, because the court found that said sale was unfairly and fraudulently conducted by the defendant with the “intent and design on his part to foreclose plaintiff’s equity of redemption in and to the mortgaged per sonal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Price's Adm'r v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
  2. Wright v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Wickliff v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ulrich v. Security Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Elmore Jameson Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Sherlock v. Alturas State BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Faivret v. First Nat. Bank in RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  5. Helmick v. HoladayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API