Legal Opinion
Helmick v. Holaday
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 12, 1930No. Docket No. 7261PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
This is an action to recover the sum of $3,320.44 and interest, according to terms of a certain promissory note. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendants and the plaintiff appeals.
Appellant contends that certain findings of fact are not sustained by the evidence and the judgment should therefore be reversed.
The evidence discloses that on December 5, 1924, the defendant Anna M. Almony was the owner of a lease of an apartment house in the city of Los Angeles, known as the Auburn Apartments and that she owned all of the furniture used in connection therewith; that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Henderson v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Sherlock v. Alturas State BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elmore Jameson Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Faivret v. First Nat. Bank in RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Schafer v. Wholesale Frozen Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957