Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 7, 1988No. 88-0081-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

Kurt Hamilton appeals from a judgment of conviction finding him guilty of twice violating sec. 943.37(3), Stats. Specifically, he was convicted of knowingly possessing, with intent to prevent their identification, an in-car stereo and a boom box with altered or removed serial numbers.

Hamilton raises two issues. First, he argues that the jury was improperly instructed that it could find the elements of knowledge and intent if it found similarity among two or more of the items allegedly found in his possession with the serial numbers altered or removed: a microwave, an in-car stereo, and a boom…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. DyessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. RabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. United States v. RaynorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. State v. ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MultalerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. DavisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. GraysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. MultalerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API