Stevens v. Lycan & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion of defendants William Olson and James Deneen for dismissal of the action as to them on the ground that the complaint fails to state facts upon which relief may be granted against them. The trial court treated the motion as one for summary judgment and certified the question presented as important and doubtful. We shall so treat it, and, as such, it is appealable.
For the purposes of this appeal, the facts alleged in the complaint must be taken as true. They may be briefly stated as follows: Bemidji is a city operating under a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- House v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Schigley v. City of WasecaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Altnow v. Town of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Tholkes v. DecockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pierce v. Foley Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Village of Roseville v. Sunset Memorial Park Assn. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006