Legal Opinion

Alston v. . Alston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating tbe case: It is tbe position of tbe plaintiff, appellant, tbat tbe court acted without authority in reassembling tbe jury, after its discharge, and permitting a change in tbe verdict wbicb bad previously been rendered. Tbe record fails to disclose tbe reason for tbis procedure, as tbe evidence was amply sufficient to support tbe verdict. In fact, tbe evidence was all one way as to tbe alleged treatment of tbe plaintiff by tbe defendant. According to tbe ■ plaintiff’s testimony, the defendant deliberately threw boiling water on Mm in August and inflicted such serious…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCabe Lumber Co. v. Beaufort County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Wright v. . HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Mitchell v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lipscomb v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Wood v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Columbus Oil Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Livingston v. . LivingstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API