Legal Opinion

Clinchy v. Grandview Dairy, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The evidence produced upon the present trial justified a finding by the jury that plaintiff, an insurance broker, was engaged by the defendant to secure public liability and property damage insurance; that after several weeks’ work the plaintiff secured from the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York an agreement to insure said risks, and defendant agreed, without reservation, on November 19, 1937, to accept such policies. Binders were issued by the insurance company mentioned. On November 20, 1937, defendant’s office refused to accept the policies unless *52the insurance company substituted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Marcol, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Clinchy v. Grandview Dairy, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Clinchy v. Grandview Dairy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walter G. Keyser & Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  2. Western National Insurance v. Haph Brokerage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
  3. Wiesenberger v. MayersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API