Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wiesenberger v. Mayers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 1952Published

1DissentOallahan, J.

In my opinion Special Term erred in granting summary judgment for defendants. It did so on what appears to be untenable grounds. It held, in effect, that neither the sellers nor the buyer were irrevocably committed to each other on the sale of certain stock and that the broker had not earned his commissions even though the buyer was ready, able and willing to buy and the sellers were the ones who refused to complete the sale.

The agreement gave the broker an exclusive right to sell all defendants’ stock in L. & C. Mayers Co., Inc., on or before August 31, 1950, for the price of $2,500,000 “…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Mooney v. . ElderNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Colvin v. . Post Mortgage Land Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Tanenbaum v. . BoehmNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Ostroff v. . DoctorNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API