Legal Opinion

Carimando v. Checkr, Inc.

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided April 29, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00521Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII TANSEL CARIMANDO, ) Civil No. 24-00521 DKW-KJM ) Plaintiffs, ) FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT vs. ) DEFENDANT CHECKR, INC.’S ) MOTION TO COMPEL CHECKR, INC., and UBER ) ARBITRATION AND STAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) PROCEEDINGS ) Defendants. ) _______________________________) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT DEFENDANT CHECKR, INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS On February 11, 2025, Defendant Checkr, Inc. (“Defendant Checkr”), filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (“Motion”). ECF…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Smith v. SpizzirriSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  5. Cox v. Ocean View Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API