Legal Opinion
People v. Woodward
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 2011No. C063517PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOCH, J.
In People v. Woodward (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 821 [10 Cal.Rptr.3d 779], we affirmed defendant Daniel Woodward’s convictions for possessing child pornography (Pen. Code, § 311.11, subd. (a))1 and committing a lewd and lascivious act on a child under the age of 14 (§ 288, subd. (a)) against B., his daughter. (116 Cal.App.4th at pp. 825-826.) While defendant was serving the resulting prison sentence, the Sacramento County District Attorney charged defendant with committing two counts of lewd and lascivious acts on a child under the age of 14 against T.C. and A.G. (§ 288, subd.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. ManceboCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re VarnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. JeffersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Morales, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- P. v. Hutt CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. Dominguez CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Fernandez CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Molina CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2014