Legal Opinion

Schneidmiller v. Engstrom

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1949No. 12235PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the conclusion of Judge Driver, 81 F.Supp. 854, that the applicable limitation is the two year limitation of Section 11, sub. e of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 29, sub. e, and not the six months limitation of the Washington Statute. Laws of Washington, 1941, Chapter 103, Sections 1, 2, 3; Remington’s Revised Statutes Supplement 1941, Sections 5831—4, 5831—5, 5831—6.

We think the question raised on appeal, as to whether the petition for arrangement filed pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 701 et seq., is the equivalent of an application for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Engstrom v. De VosDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Engstrom v. WileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Jackson v. FlohrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. United States Ex Rel. Baruch v. Paul Hardeman, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1966
  4. Jackson v. FlohrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Jackson v. FlohrDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API