Legal Opinion
Lintz v. Skipski
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided November 25, 1992No. 1:92-cr-00083PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming they were deprived of constitutional rights. They have also alleged several pendent state law claims. Defendants Linda Skipski, Kendall Krause, Shirley Krause, Dale Krause and the Cass County Department of Social Services have filed motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment claiming a variety of defenses and immunities.
FACTS
Plaintiff Sherry Lintz is the natural parent of the minor plaintiffs, Richele Jacobs, Brian Jacobs and Keith Lintz, Jr. Plaintiff Keith Lintz, Sr. is the natural…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Rayburn v. HogueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Sherman T. PeneauxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Sherry Lintz Keith Lintz, Sr. Richele Nicole Jacobs Brian Allen Jacobs and Keith Lintz, Jr., by Next Friend Sherry Lintz v. Linda K. SkipskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Brown v. HatchDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- P.G. v. Ramsey CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.