Legal Opinion
Boring v. Jungers
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 17, 1960No. [No. 218, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
The chancellor refused Mr. and Mrs. Boring, the appellants, rescission of a deed to them and the purchase money mortgage from them, as well as an injunction against foreclosure or other enforcement of the mortgage, and they urge fraud and misrepresentation in seeking reversal.
The Borings have dealt in real estate in Carroll County from time to time. In late 1957 they sought acreage which could be developed and resold profitably for commercial and residential use. They employed Adolph Furman, a Baltimore realtor, to purchase for them a tract of land near Finksburg, which they had noticed had a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Atlantic Delaine Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Brewer v. HerbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- The Glendale Corp. v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Mayor of Baltimore v. WhittingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Wenstrom Consolidated Dynamo & Motor Co. v. PurnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Chesapeake Homes, Inc. v. McGrathCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Durst v. DurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Master v. MasterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Shrives v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Carozza v. Peacock Land Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.