Legal Opinion

Wenstrom Consolidated Dynamo & Motor Co. v. Purnell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 17, 1891PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated iu the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtAlvey, C. J.

The plaintiff helow, the appellee here, filed his hill against the appellant, and E. L. Tunis, the defendants helow, for the purpose of having rescinded his contract of subscription to the capital stock of the defendant corporation, procured from him, as alleged, by the fraudulent misrepresentation of E. L. Tunis, the agent and one of the principal promoters of such corporation. By the decree of the Court helow, the contract of subscription was rescinded, and declared null and void; and the corporation defendant was decreed to pay hack to the plaintiff the amount of money paid on the shares…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atlantic Delaine Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Russell v. Industrial Transp. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Boring v. JungersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Barcus v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1898
  4. Sears v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  5. Byrd v. RautmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API