Legal Opinion
D.F. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 24, 2015No. A146191PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Introduction
BANKE, J.
The juvenile court denied reunification services to D.F., the mother of A.M. (Mother), under Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivision (b)(ll), because her parental rights to another child had been permanently severed.1 Mother challenges the order bypassing reunification services and setting a permanency planning hearing, asserting subdivision (b)(ll) does not apply because her parental rights were severed in another state. Mother relies on our decision in Melissa R. v. Superior Court (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 816 [144 Cal.Rtpr.3d 48] (Melissa R.), in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- R.T. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Melissa R. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
3Cited by4 opinions
- A.People v. Super. Ct. CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- C.T. v. Superior Court CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- In re E.M. CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
- S.V. v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018