Legal Opinion

Ikebe v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 16, 1941No. Nos. 7436, 7454, 7456PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge.

The question presented by these appeals is whether the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company assumed liability for the payment of certain annuities bequeathed by the will of Thomas E. Mitten, deceased. The annuitants pressed such claims in the proceeding below for the reorganization of the Transit Company, a debtor. The District Court held that the asserted liability did not exist and directed that the debtor “discontinue payments of the sums of money bequeathed as annuities or legacies by the will of Thomas E. Mitten, deceased”. From that order, the petitioning annuitants…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Brown v. Fletcher's EstateSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Cooper v. NewellSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perkasie Vulcanizing Co. v. Mundorf, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API