Legal Opinion
Seegull Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 28, 1984No. 83-5248PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board (N.L.R.B./Board) has appealed the district court’s decision to award attorney fees to the plaintiff, Seegull Manufacturing Company (Seegull), in this proceeding under the Freedom of Information Act. This court’s previous opinion in this case, issued June 1, 1984, 735 F.2d 971, is vacated and the instant decision is issued in its stead.
The facts are not in dispute. On December 28 and 30, 1981, the Board concluded unfair labor practice charges against See-gull filed, respectively, by former Seegull ■employees Margie Gilley (Gilley) and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richard L. Bast v. U. S. Department of Justice. Richard L. Bast v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Herbert L. Fenster v. Harold Brown, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Lovell v. AldereteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Joseph Falcone v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Dennis M. Wolfel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jordan v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- People Ex Rel. Ulrich v. StukelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- State of Texas v. Interstate Commerce Commission, and Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Constangy, Brooks & Smith, by Larry W. Bridgesmith on Behalf of Teledyne Industries, Inc., D/B/A Teledyne Still-Man v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Horsehead Industries, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.