Legal Opinion

Skaggs v. Yunck

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 18, 1972No. 107798PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

The issue is whether the executrix of the estate of Lucy A. Hoak, deceased, must pay, out of the “probate estate,” all federal estate taxes attributable to decedent’s “taxable estate.”

Lucy A. Hoak’s taxable estate, for purposes of federal law, is composed of: (1) her “probate estate,” i.e., that property that passed under the terms of her will; and (2) her “non-probate estate,” i.e., that property conveyed by inter vivos gifts, plus the property that passed under the terms of an inter vivos trust.

Petitioners received inter vivos gifts from Lucy A. Hoak, and became beneficiaries under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Annie G. Crozier EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
  2. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  3. Beatty v. CakeOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Matter of Estate of KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In re the Estate of ShoemakerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
  4. Dakota Midland Hospital v. PagelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hammond v. RushCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API